2004
DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
69
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Within the limits of this study, dental implant emergence into healthy maxillary sinus is considered a safe and successful procedure.…”
Section: Sitementioning
confidence: 96%
“…11 Within the limits of this study, dental implant emergence into healthy maxillary sinus is considered a safe and successful procedure.…”
Section: Sitementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although an endoscopic study has revealed that the sinus floor may be elevated by anything up to 5 mm without perforating the sinus membrane, [41] other studies have demonstrated the risk of membrane perforation while performing transalveolar sinus floor elevation of more than 4 mm. [42,43] Lai et al [44] have published a randomized clinical trial comparing OSFE with and without graft materials, reporting membrane perforation rates of 7.8% and 2.6%, with mean residual bone heights of 4.7 and 5.6 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limitations of this procedure include: limited accessibility and visibility for elevation of the sinus membrane and inability to diagnose and treat membrane perforations. (27,28,10) When the membrane is lifted more than 3 mm, the risk of membrane perforation increases significantly. (29,30) The use of an endoscope has been proposed to diagnose the membrane perforation during BAOSFE, increasing the cost and time of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%