2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Removal of Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chief advantages that the trans-sphenoidal approaches present are lack of brain retraction, early devascularization of tumor supply, early bilateral optic nerve decompression, minimal handling of the optic nerve, and superior hypophyseal artery at the very end of tumor resection and better cosmesis. 14 21 22 On the contrary, the trans-sphenoidal approach has its own fair share of limitations, which include the application of greater force on the surrounding structures in comparison with micro-instruments, difficult access in case of tumors with significant lateral extension, difficulty in achieving Simpson Grade I resection as it is difficult to resect the entire dural attachment, and postoperative CSF leak that has been reported to be as high as 20 to 30%. 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chief advantages that the trans-sphenoidal approaches present are lack of brain retraction, early devascularization of tumor supply, early bilateral optic nerve decompression, minimal handling of the optic nerve, and superior hypophyseal artery at the very end of tumor resection and better cosmesis. 14 21 22 On the contrary, the trans-sphenoidal approach has its own fair share of limitations, which include the application of greater force on the surrounding structures in comparison with micro-instruments, difficult access in case of tumors with significant lateral extension, difficulty in achieving Simpson Grade I resection as it is difficult to resect the entire dural attachment, and postoperative CSF leak that has been reported to be as high as 20 to 30%. 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our data, only 4 out of 14 cases of CSF leakage did not develop subarachnoid invasion. Suprasellar tumors, especially tuberculum sellae meningiomas, were difficult to keep the arachnoid intact after lesion removal because of the tumor consistency, and even accompanied with injury to the brain tissue and perforating vessels ( 19 , 20 ), the risk of CSF leakage is relatively high in these cases. Therefore, we point out that the integrity of the arachnoid is a more influencing factor than the tumor size or suprasellar extension in postoperative CSF leakage, which is consistent with findings of Campero et al described previously ( 21 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review article by Ditzel Filho et al . [ 12 ] found 29 studies where the endoscopic transnasal approach to tuberculum sellae meningiomas were reported, with a total of 203 patients operated. The rates of gross total resection ranged from 54% to 100%, with 19% rate of postoperative CSF leak reported as the most common surgical complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%