2012
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.746392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic assessment and grading of Barrett's esophagus using magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging: Impact of structured learning and experience on the accuracy of the Amsterdam classification system

Abstract: Using a dedicated learning program, the ME-NBI Amsterdam classification system is suboptimal in terms of accuracy and inter- and intraobserver agreements. These results reiterate the questionable utility of corresponding classification system in clinical routine practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 There have been multiple studies looking at the reproducibility of NBI with magnification. [17][18][19][20][21] Curvers et al 17 looked at the interobserver agreement based on the mucosal and vascular morphology described previously by Kara et al 10 NBI did not improve interobserver agreement or accuracy over HD-WLE. The interobserver agreement for NBI diagnosis ranged from a k of 0.40 to 0.56 (moderate) and did not significantly differ between expert and nonexpert endoscopists.…”
Section: Narrow-band Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…16 There have been multiple studies looking at the reproducibility of NBI with magnification. [17][18][19][20][21] Curvers et al 17 looked at the interobserver agreement based on the mucosal and vascular morphology described previously by Kara et al 10 NBI did not improve interobserver agreement or accuracy over HD-WLE. The interobserver agreement for NBI diagnosis ranged from a k of 0.40 to 0.56 (moderate) and did not significantly differ between expert and nonexpert endoscopists.…”
Section: Narrow-band Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to standardize endoscopic evaluation of BE and dysplastic lesions, various classification systems have been developed, combining magnification endoscopy and NBI . However, these systems have been suboptimal with regard to accuracy, interobserver and intraobserver agreements between non‐experts and experts . Hence, an international working group consisting of experts from the USA, Europe and Japan, known as the Barrett's International NBI Group (BING), convened to develop criteria to use NBI in BE.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Diagnostic Surveillance In Be Dysplasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preferably, high resolution endoscopes should be used to examine the mucosa. Whether narrow band imaging or related techniques are useful or mandatory remains somewhat controversial although the latter technique is often used in expert units …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether narrow band imaging or related techniques are useful or mandatory remains somewhat controversial although the latter technique is often used in expert units. 12,13 Neoplastic changes may present as a visible focal suspicious alteration of the mucosal lining to be graded according to the Paris classification system (Figs 5,6). Early neoplastic lesions are often centered in the 2-o'clock to 5-o'clock spatial location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%