2018
DOI: 10.1002/alr.22124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic and external approaches for orbital decompression: an analysis of trends from a U.S. perspective

Abstract: There has not been a clear movement toward the endoscopic approach for orbital decompression, with modest growth when compared with external approaches. Potential explanations include the specialty-exclusive nature of approaches, as well as a lack of consensus; the latter idea is further reinforced by geographic variation. High-quality prospective trials may clarify the role of endoscopic approaches in these patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They remark on the importance of collaboration between otolaryngologists and allergists, as was originally envisioned by the otolaryngologic pioneer in the field, Dr. French Hansel. In another article, Svider et al . evaluate trends in orbital decompression and actually note a slight decrease in the relative percentage of orbital decompression performed endoscopically in the last decade.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They remark on the importance of collaboration between otolaryngologists and allergists, as was originally envisioned by the otolaryngologic pioneer in the field, Dr. French Hansel. In another article, Svider et al . evaluate trends in orbital decompression and actually note a slight decrease in the relative percentage of orbital decompression performed endoscopically in the last decade.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%