2012
DOI: 10.1159/000342919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endorectal Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Useful Diagnostic Tool for Perirectal and Intraluminal Lesions

Abstract: Objectives: Endorectal endoscopic ultrasound (ERUS) allows highly detailed assessment of the rectal wall layers and visualization of the extraluminal structures. Herein, we study the utility of ERUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to evaluate perirectal lesions. Study Design: Forty-nine ERUS-FNAs were retrieved from the cytopathology archives of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. The cytology slides, corresponding histology, immunohistochemistry when available, and clinical data were reviewed. Results: The aspirated mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current study are consistent with the previous smaller series regarding the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PEUS-FNA. [1][2][3][8][9][10][11][12][13] ROSE was performed in nearly all cases. The results of the current study support the usefulness of ROSE in terms of increasing the diagnostic yield by limiting the number of passes and decreasing the number of inadequate samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the current study are consistent with the previous smaller series regarding the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PEUS-FNA. [1][2][3][8][9][10][11][12][13] ROSE was performed in nearly all cases. The results of the current study support the usefulness of ROSE in terms of increasing the diagnostic yield by limiting the number of passes and decreasing the number of inadequate samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Boo et al 15 performed eus fna or eus-trucut biopsy in 4 patients with perirectal lesions and were able to obtain cytology or tissue for diagnosis in all of them. finally, maleki et al 16 described the usefulness of eus fna in the diagnosis of perirectal lesions. in this series, only 9 patients with a history of CRC were included, and in all of them the cytology confirmed the recurrence of the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS-FNA has a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 89%, 79%, 89% and 79% respectively[97,101]. The fact that EUS-FNA has a moderate NPV (77%) for N staging means that LN metastases cannot be ruled out by a negative FNA[102]. Even though most perirectal nodes detected by EUS in patients with RC are metastatic, it is important to confirm this.…”
Section: Rectal Colon and Anal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%