Endophytic Bacterial Consortia as Biological Control of Bacterial Leaf Blight and Plant Growth Promoter of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Abstract

The consortia of endophytic bacteria with various mechanisms (competition, antibiotics, induction of resistance, and others), simultaneously, are more effective in controlling pathogens and increasing plant growth. The purpose of this study was to obtain endophytic bacterial consortia capable of suppressing of bacterial leaf blight and promoting the growth of rice plants. The study consisted of three experimental stages. The first stage was the test on the antibiosis ability of the endophytic bacterial consortia to suppress of pathogenic bacteria Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) using the Kirby Bauer method. The second stage was the test on the ability of endophytic bacterial consortia to promote the growth of rice seedlings. The experiment was arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) which consisted of six combinations of endophytic bacterial consortia and 15 replications within each combination. The endophytic bacterial consortia were introduced by soaking the seeds, and the observations were made on the plant height, number of leaves, root length, fresh weight, and dry weight of rice seedlings. Meanwhile, the third stage was the test on the ability of endophytic bacterial consortia to suppress of bacterial leaf blight (BLB) diseases and to promote the rice plant growth. The experiment was arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with six combinations of endophytic bacterial consortia and five replications within each combination. The endophytic bacterial consortia were introduced by soaking the roots of the seedlings. The observations were made on the incidence of disease, disease severity, number of leaves, plant height, and number of tillers. The results showed that all endophytic bacterial consortia had antibiosis abilities. The best endophytic bacterial consortia for controlling bacterial leaf blight and promoting the growth of rice seedlings and plants were the C (Bacillus sp SJI; Bacillus sp HI) and D (Bacillus sp SJI; S.marcescens isolate JB1E3) consortia.

Medicinal Plants and Their Bacterial Microbiota: A Review on Antimicrobial Compounds Production for Plant and Human Health

“…To this aim, several works highlight the opportunity offered by the analysis of plant–endophytes interaction to discover new molecules with high therapeutic potential against human pathogens [ 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Moreover, there are numerous examples of the use of endophyte consortia, or combinations with other microorganisms and/or inhibitors to fight dangerous phytopathogens through an enhancing effect on plant growth [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ]. Further development of in vitro plant–endophytes models is, therefore, needed and desirable to shed light on the exploitation of new resources in these fields.…”

Efektivitas Rizobakteri Sebagai PGPR Untuk Pertumbuhan Stek Daun Tanaman Hias Peperomia Turboensis

“…Mekanisme rizobakteri mengendalikan penyakit dapat melalui beberapa cara yaitu melalui produksi senyawa antibiosis, persaingan ruang atau nutrisi, persaingan pemanfaatan unsur Fe melalui produksi senyawa siderofor, induksi mekanisme ketahanan, memalui inaktivasi perkecambahan kecambah dan produksi toksin, parasitisme yang melibatkan enzim pedegradasi dinding sel seperti enzim kitinase, â-1.3 glukanase (Van Loon, 2007). Lebih lanjut, bahwa mekanisme PGPR sebagai agens pengendali hayati dapat melalui resistensi sistemik, pemanfaatan Fe, ruang dan persaingan hara, sintesis antibiotik, produksi asam litik dan hidrogen sianida (Odoh and Chukc, 2017;Khotchanalekha et al, 2020;Resti et al, 2020).…”

Aplikasi Konsorsium Endo-Rhizobakteri Untuk Meningkatkan Vigor Benih Padi Gogo Lokal

“…Selain itu, konsorsium mikroba meningkatkan parameter panjang daun, akar, dan batang, tinggi tanaman, jumlah daun, dan bobot 100 biji dibandingkan dengan inokulan tunggal (Olanrewaju & Babalola, 2019). Lebih lanjut, Resti et al (2020) Hasil uji DMRT α=0,05 pada Gambar 1 menunjukkan bahwa akar terpanjang diperoleh pada perlakuan isolat Be02 + Bacillus sp. CKD061 (B) sebesar 12,82 cm yang berbeda tidak nyata dengan perlakuan lainnya tetapi berbeda nyata dengan kontrol (K) sebesar 8,98 cm.…”