2015
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endophytic bacteria affect sugarcane physiology without changing plant growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are many reports on the effects of K. radicincitans (formerly known as E. radicincitans ) on a range of plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, radish, and tomato ( Berger, Brock & Ruppel, 2013 ; Brock et al, 2013 ; Berger et al, 2015 ), there are no reports on the effects of this bacterial species on sorghum growth or root architecture modification. With respect to P. fluorescens, Marcos et al (2016) found that the strain IAC/BECa 141, when used as an inoculant applied to two sugarcane varieties, increased chlorophyll a content without changing plant growth. Kumar et al (2012) studying the effect of seven different fluorescent Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many reports on the effects of K. radicincitans (formerly known as E. radicincitans ) on a range of plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, radish, and tomato ( Berger, Brock & Ruppel, 2013 ; Brock et al, 2013 ; Berger et al, 2015 ), there are no reports on the effects of this bacterial species on sorghum growth or root architecture modification. With respect to P. fluorescens, Marcos et al (2016) found that the strain IAC/BECa 141, when used as an inoculant applied to two sugarcane varieties, increased chlorophyll a content without changing plant growth. Kumar et al (2012) studying the effect of seven different fluorescent Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high microbial diversity challenges the introduction of new bacterial inoculants due to a high competition for physical space and niches, justifying the importance of the search for different and more efficient bacterial plant-promoting strains able to colonize sugarcane roots. Recent studies recognized the endophytic bacteria Paraburkholderia caribensis IAC/BECa-088, Paraburkholderia tropica IAC/BECa-135, Kosakonia radicincitans IAC/BECa-095, Pseudomonas fluorescens IAC/BECa-141, and Herbaspirillum frisingense IAC/BECa-152 as suitable inocula for sugarcane cultivation with the potential for alleviating Al stress in sugarcane plantlets [6,13,17]. These bacteria possess desirable characteristics of PGPB, such as antagonistic activities against phytopathogens, siderophore, auxins, and cyanide production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these results document the ability of Paenibacillus strain s37 to enhance the concentrations of both free and storage carbohydrates and affect their allocation in the different plant tissues. Other bacterial inoculants have been reported to increase affect plant carbohydrate levels ( Marcos et al, 2016 ; Qin et al, 2016 ) but the mechanism behind the effect of bacterial inoculations on the concentrations of plant carbohydrates is still poorly understood ( Magel et al, 2000 ; Gagné-Bourque et al, 2016 ). In consequence, there is a need to implement physiological phenotyping into a holistic phenomics approach ( Großkinsky et al, 2015 , 2018 ) to clarify how bacterial inoculation affects the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in A. nordmanniana.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sucrose is the form in which most carbon is transported in the plant ( El-Lithy et al, 2010 ), whereas small size monosaccharides are actively used for growth ( Schiestl-Aalto et al, 2019 ). Hence, the concentration and distribution of NSC is indicative of the accumulated carbohydrate reserves available for growth, and can be affected by bacterial inoculants, even sometimes without affecting growth ( Vardharajula et al, 2011 ; Gagné-Bourque et al, 2016 ; Marcos et al, 2016 ), indicating that carbohydrate levels may be sensitive markers of inoculant impact on plant physiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%