2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endophthalmitis Isolates and Antibiotic Susceptibilities: A 10-Year Review of Culture-Proven Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
64
6
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
64
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Study from Tehran by Falavarjani et al has reported low resistance of ceftazidime (10 %) in GNB [11]. Schimel et al from USA reviewed the spectrum and susceptibilities of isolates from patients with endophthalmitis and found all GNB (100 %) susceptible to ceftazidime [9]. In the present study, we have found 18 % of the GNB are resistant to ceftazidime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Study from Tehran by Falavarjani et al has reported low resistance of ceftazidime (10 %) in GNB [11]. Schimel et al from USA reviewed the spectrum and susceptibilities of isolates from patients with endophthalmitis and found all GNB (100 %) susceptible to ceftazidime [9]. In the present study, we have found 18 % of the GNB are resistant to ceftazidime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility of organisms isolated from patients with endophthalmitis vary by region and country. Several reports have shown that all the Gram positive bacterial isolates are susceptible to vancomycin [8][9][10][11] except few cases of endophthalmitis with vancomycin resistant Enterococcus species [12,13]. Khera et al from Hyderabad, India have shown that 1.5 % of the total Gram positive isolates are resistant to vancomycin [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with other reports, gram-positive organisms were the predominant pathogens, and Staphylococcus species remained to be the most common infectious organisms. 1,[9][10][11][12][13][14] The differences between this and previous reports included the present observation of a larger proportion of fungi than gram-negative organisms (18.4 vs.16.6) and the decrease in gram-negative organisms from 32% to 11% (P = 0.019) and increase in the percentage of gram-positive bacteria from 49% to 73% (P = 0.174) over a 10-year period, which disagree with the findings of a study by Gentile et al 15 The reasons for this difference remain unclear. Factors influencing variation between multiple reported studies include the period in time analyzed, prevalence of predisposing illnesses, geographic factors in organism incidence, urban versus rural settings, ethnicity, outpatient versus inpatient populations especially those in tertiary care centers, and climatic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown an increased rate of antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains in the conjunctiva of patients receiving multiple courses of local antibiotic therapy [27-29]. Furthermore, there are reports of an increased rate of endophthalmitis cases caused by antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus over the last two decades [30, 31]. It is suspected that antibiotic-resistant strains cause more inflammation and destruction of the infected retina than nonresistant pathogens, as shown in an animal model [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%