2003
DOI: 10.1080/0144361021000043254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrial ablation with the Cavaterm™ thermal balloon

Abstract: This prospective observational study evaluates the efficacy and safety of thermal Balloon endometrial ablation using the Cavaterm system for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Seventy-seven women with a mean age of 43 years who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were treated under general anaesthesia. A 9-mm diameter catheter with a silicone balloon at its tip was inserted transcervically into the uterus and was inflated with sterile 1.5% glycine and connected to a control unit that maintai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined amenorrhoea and hypomenorrhoea rates seen in the current study compare favourably to those seen in published studies utilising the old Cavaterm TM system (56 -82%), despite a 33% reduction in ablation time from 15 to 10 minutes and longer follow-up (Hawe et al, 1999;Abbott et al, 2003;Alaily et al, 2003;Vihko et al, 2003). Similarly, the overall patient satisfaction with the new system is comparable to that reported in the earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The combined amenorrhoea and hypomenorrhoea rates seen in the current study compare favourably to those seen in published studies utilising the old Cavaterm TM system (56 -82%), despite a 33% reduction in ablation time from 15 to 10 minutes and longer follow-up (Hawe et al, 1999;Abbott et al, 2003;Alaily et al, 2003;Vihko et al, 2003). Similarly, the overall patient satisfaction with the new system is comparable to that reported in the earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%