1992
DOI: 10.1177/0003489492101s1010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endolymphatic Hydrops Induced by Immune Response of the Endolymphatic Sac: Relation to Perilymph Antibody Levels

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of a secondary immune response in the endolymphatic sac on the development of endolymphatic hydrops in guinea pigs. Following secondary keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) challenge directly to the sac in systemically presensitized animals, hydrops rapidly developed within 1 week, then gradually reduced by 4 weeks. After 5 weeks, hydrops gradually recurred and developed again. Mean perilymph anti-KLH antibody levels rose from day 1 to 4 weeks and then decreased. The elevation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altermatt et al [1990] demonstrated the presence of MHC class II in the normal human endolymphatic sac directly, using anti-MHC-class-II antibodies. This is consistent with the observation that reaction to foreign substances and viruses occurs preferentially in the endolymphatic sac, inducing endolymphatic hydrops after repeated inflammation [Tomiyama and Harris, 1987;Gloddek and Harris, 1989;Tomiyama, 1992]. However, there is evidence from experimental and clinical data that immunological reactions of the inner ear are not always associated with endolymphatic sac involvement [Hughes et al, 1988;Veldman, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Altermatt et al [1990] demonstrated the presence of MHC class II in the normal human endolymphatic sac directly, using anti-MHC-class-II antibodies. This is consistent with the observation that reaction to foreign substances and viruses occurs preferentially in the endolymphatic sac, inducing endolymphatic hydrops after repeated inflammation [Tomiyama and Harris, 1987;Gloddek and Harris, 1989;Tomiyama, 1992]. However, there is evidence from experimental and clinical data that immunological reactions of the inner ear are not always associated with endolymphatic sac involvement [Hughes et al, 1988;Veldman, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous immunological studies of progressive sensorineural hearing loss have suggested that an immunological mechanism may be involved in the development of endolymphatic hydrops, although an inner ear target antigen has yet to be described [7] . McCabe [8] was the first to propose an immunological pathogenetic mechanism for endolymphatic hydrops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously demonstrated that elevation of peri lymph antibody levels in the early phase was due to an influx of serum but not due to antibody production in the endolymphatic sac [7], Following the type III immune reaction in the endolymphatic sac, acute inflammatory cellular infiltration gradually occurred in the endolym phatic sac from 5 h after antigen challenge and reached a maximum at 12 h. This severe inflammatory reaction per sisted for 3 days and was gradually followed by infiltration of plasma cells and lymphocytes [9]. These findings sug gest that a type III immune reaction can induce an increased vascular permeability of the inner ear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%