2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000200581.70571.8a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endolymphatic Duct Status During Middle Fossa Dissection of the Internal Auditory Canal: A Human Temporal Bone Radiographic Study

Abstract: The ELD is not vulnerable to injury during IAC dissection using the middle fossa approach. A previous radiographic study has shown that the ELD is violated in 24% of temporal bones during retrosigmoid dissection of the IAC. These findings support and may help explain other outcome studies that show that long-term hearing results are superior with the use of the middle fossa approach when compared to results following retrosigmoid dissection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the RSC approach, MFC carries a far lower risk of entry into the endolymphatic duct with drilling over the IAC [17,25], and the risk of delayed hearing loss is not significant [24]. Postoperative CSF leak risk is comparable between MFC and TLC, ranging between 1.1% [5] and 5.5% [22 ].…”
Section: Middle Fossa Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the RSC approach, MFC carries a far lower risk of entry into the endolymphatic duct with drilling over the IAC [17,25], and the risk of delayed hearing loss is not significant [24]. Postoperative CSF leak risk is comparable between MFC and TLC, ranging between 1.1% [5] and 5.5% [22 ].…”
Section: Middle Fossa Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%