2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous versus exogenous change: Change detection, self and agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, performances exhibited greater variability in the persons with schizophrenia group than in the healthy control group, as observed in previous studies both in motor (Karantinos et al, 2014) and cognitive tasks (Shin et al, 2013). Variability is supposed to reflect the instability of the processes underlying the task (Berberian and Cleeremans, 2010;Kanai and Rees, 2011) and has even been proposed as the best way to distinguish normal from pathological members of the population, such as individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Di Martino et al, 2008). In our study, variability in the SCR could reflect the instability of affective processes in schizophrenia.…”
Section: Controls Patientsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Additionally, performances exhibited greater variability in the persons with schizophrenia group than in the healthy control group, as observed in previous studies both in motor (Karantinos et al, 2014) and cognitive tasks (Shin et al, 2013). Variability is supposed to reflect the instability of the processes underlying the task (Berberian and Cleeremans, 2010;Kanai and Rees, 2011) and has even been proposed as the best way to distinguish normal from pathological members of the population, such as individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Di Martino et al, 2008). In our study, variability in the SCR could reflect the instability of affective processes in schizophrenia.…”
Section: Controls Patientsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Second, all of them are reformulations that have occurred within a year of initial legalization. Factors explaining public policy change include the emergence of endogenous or exogenous crises to be resolved (Berberian & Cleeremans, 2010; Nohrstedt & Weible, 2010), or the failure of an existing policy (McConnell, 2010; Strother, 2018). In the three case studies in the present article, given the novelty of initial policies, it is difficult to identify an objective crisis or policy failure that would have required policy makers to amend original regulations.…”
Section: Case Selection and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%