2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3152579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence confirms the results in Angelini et al (2017), who identify the structural shocks by using the identification-through-heteroskedasticity approach developed in Bacchiocchi and Fanelli (2015) and Bacchiocchi et al (2018). It also lines up with Carriero et al (2018), who identify the structural shocks by using a stochastic volatility approach (using both monthly and quarterly variables) but using measures of macroeconomic and financial uncertainty one at a time. Carriero et al (2018) report mild evidence for the endogeneity of uncertainty, and this evidence is limited to financial uncertainty and, mainly, to monthly variables.…”
Section: The Upper Panel Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This evidence confirms the results in Angelini et al (2017), who identify the structural shocks by using the identification-through-heteroskedasticity approach developed in Bacchiocchi and Fanelli (2015) and Bacchiocchi et al (2018). It also lines up with Carriero et al (2018), who identify the structural shocks by using a stochastic volatility approach (using both monthly and quarterly variables) but using measures of macroeconomic and financial uncertainty one at a time. Carriero et al (2018) report mild evidence for the endogeneity of uncertainty, and this evidence is limited to financial uncertainty and, mainly, to monthly variables.…”
Section: The Upper Panel Ofsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It also lines up with Carriero et al (2018), who identify the structural shocks by using a stochastic volatility approach (using both monthly and quarterly variables) but using measures of macroeconomic and financial uncertainty one at a time. Carriero et al (2018) report mild evidence for the endogeneity of uncertainty, and this evidence is limited to financial uncertainty and, mainly, to monthly variables. Finally, our empirical results are partially consistent with Ludvigson et al (2018), who report that sharply higher uncertainty about real economic activity in recessions is an endogenous response to other shocks, while uncertainty about financial markets is a likely…”
Section: The Upper Panel Ofmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 Our identifying assumption is also similar to that of Baker et al (2016) except we placed the federal funds rate after CPI and output. Such an 9 While the emerging literature questions the exogeneity of uncertainty shocks and argues that uncertainty could increase as an "endogenous" response to aggregate fluctuations (Ludvigson et al, 2015;Fajgelbaum et al, 2017;Carreiro et al, 2018;Plante et al, 2018), we adopt the most commonly used identification here to facilitate comparisons with many existing empirical studies, as well as to give the uncertainty shock the best chance as a business cycle driver.…”
Section: A Structural Vector Autoregressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%