2016
DOI: 10.3386/w22005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence

Abstract: Thanks to Francesco Bianchi, Bob Hall, Howard Kung, and Chris Tonetti for helpful comments. Financial assistance from the NSF is greatly appreciated. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
182
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
182
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eggertsson and Mehrotra (2014) argue that a combination of low effective demand and the zero lower bound on nominal rates can generate a long-lived slump. In contrast, Gordon (2014), Anzoategui et al (2015) and others attribute stagnation to a decline in productivity. Hall (2015) surveys other theories as well.…”
Section: Dashed Line Is a Linear Trend That Fits Data Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggertsson and Mehrotra (2014) argue that a combination of low effective demand and the zero lower bound on nominal rates can generate a long-lived slump. In contrast, Gordon (2014), Anzoategui et al (2015) and others attribute stagnation to a decline in productivity. Hall (2015) surveys other theories as well.…”
Section: Dashed Line Is a Linear Trend That Fits Data Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in line with Rendahl (2016), but they hint that the in ‡uence of demand on aggregate supply through productivity seems to increase output multipliers much more. The results of Reifschneider et al (2015) and Anzoategui et al (2016) lead us to believe that endogenous changes in productivity are the most important factor of hysteresis. Therefore, the results of Rendahl (2016) may underestimate the e¤ectiveness of …scal policy in the presence of hysteresis.…”
Section: Transmission Of Shocks With Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The …ndings of Anzoategui et al (2016) suggest that endogenous changes in TFP caused by a fall in demand is the most important factor of hysteresis. To model endogenous changes in TFP, we add a very simple learningby-doing mechanism into the production function, following the formulation of Tervala (2013), based on the idea of Chang et al (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of these schools of thought captures an important element of the growth process. The semi-endogenous approach, while inheriting from Romer (1990) the idea that the aggregate ‡ow of innovations increases in the size of the R&D employment, stresses the increase in the di¢ culty of generating a constant TFP growth 1 . The scale free fully endogenous school of thought stresses that the number of innovations per sector increases with the fraction of the labour force which each sector employs in R&D, without assuming an increasing di¢ culty of R&D 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%