1987
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous retroviruses lead to the expression of a histocompatibility antigen detectable by skin graft rejection.

Abstract: Mov mouse strains differ from their respec-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent experiments indicate that viral sequences inserted into the mouse genome can code for minor H antigens. This was shown by the classical technique of skin graft rejection and by CTL-reactivity for the SV40 Tgene and for the Moloney mouse leukemia virus (Colombo et al 1987, Wettstein et al 1988). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More recent experiments indicate that viral sequences inserted into the mouse genome can code for minor H antigens. This was shown by the classical technique of skin graft rejection and by CTL-reactivity for the SV40 Tgene and for the Moloney mouse leukemia virus (Colombo et al 1987, Wettstein et al 1988). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Endogenous peptide presentation by MHC class II molecules is well described [44][45][46]. It is likely there exists a system of minor antigenic peptides in the b 2 m-/-MHC repertoire presented by MHC class II molecules that can be solely responsible for the initiation and maintenance of GVHD in the absence of cell surface intact class I molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous retroviral sequences can encode antigens capable of stimulating both skin graft rejection and CTL (Colombo et al 1987b), and many minor histocompatibility antigens show fight linkage to endogenous proviruses and the antigens (Meruelo et al 1983;Rossomando and Meruelo 1986). Although none of the Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%