2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2009.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous restricted participation in general financial equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of financial restrictions on prices is shared with the paper by Carosi et al (2009). In fact, the two papers bear some resemblances as well as crucial differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dependence of financial restrictions on prices is shared with the paper by Carosi et al (2009). In fact, the two papers bear some resemblances as well as crucial differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The literature on exogenously given restrictions on financial market participation is relatively large: for a recent survey, see Carosi et al (2009). Fewer contributions describing restrictions depending on endogenous variables are instead available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Indeed, a collateralized contract j can be characterized by a pair (C j , (D s,j (p s )) s∈S ), where C j = (C j,l ) l∈L ∈ R L + \ {0} is the collateral 5 Faias and Luque (2013) address an equilibrium model with exchanges where individual preferences satisfy the kind of impatience condition imposed by Seghir and Torres-Martínez (2011). Different to the example above, they allow cross listing and transactions fees.…”
Section: Example 10 (Collateralized Assets)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different to the example above, they allow cross listing and transactions fees. 6 In the absence of payment enforcement mechanisms over collateral repossession, the monotonicity of preferences guarantees that borrowers of a collateralized loan always deliver the minimum between promises and collateral values.…”
Section: Example 10 (Collateralized Assets)mentioning
confidence: 99%