2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.06.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous inhibitors of InsP3-induced Ca2+ release in neuroblastoma cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modelling predicted a remarkable initial stimulated increase in PIP 2 concomitant with activation of PLC‐mediated PIP 2 hydrolysis. Interestingly, the sensitivity of the Ins P 3 R in these cells is an order of magnitude lower than in non‐neuronal cells (Watras et al 2005). Thus, the ability of these cells to replenish PIP 2 as it is being hydrolysed makes it possible for the cell to produce sufficient Ins P 3 to produce a robust calcium release.…”
Section: Pip2 Dynamics In Neuroblastoma Cells – Stimulated Productionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The modelling predicted a remarkable initial stimulated increase in PIP 2 concomitant with activation of PLC‐mediated PIP 2 hydrolysis. Interestingly, the sensitivity of the Ins P 3 R in these cells is an order of magnitude lower than in non‐neuronal cells (Watras et al 2005). Thus, the ability of these cells to replenish PIP 2 as it is being hydrolysed makes it possible for the cell to produce sufficient Ins P 3 to produce a robust calcium release.…”
Section: Pip2 Dynamics In Neuroblastoma Cells – Stimulated Productionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One possible explanation for this apparent contradiction is, if the magnitudes of InsP 3 increases are much larger in the neuronal cells used in the Nelson study than those observed in HEK293 cells. This is not an unreasonable assumption, since N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells require much higher InsP 3 increases to induce Ca 2+ signaling than other cell types [ 37 ]. In search of an explanation for this unique feature, Watras et al has identified a protein in neurons that binds the InsP 3 receptor to significantly decrease its InsP 3 sensitivity [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not an unreasonable assumption, since N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells require much higher InsP 3 increases to induce Ca 2+ signaling than other cell types [ 37 ]. In search of an explanation for this unique feature, Watras et al has identified a protein in neurons that binds the InsP 3 receptor to significantly decrease its InsP 3 sensitivity [ 37 ]. This could make neuroblastoma cells (and perhaps other neuronal cell lines) less sensitive to InsP 3 increases requiring them to generate a lot more InsP 3 in response to agonists that could significantly displace the PLCδ1PH-GFP from the PM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the receptor density is significantly higher (13)(14)(15)(16) and the sensitivity to IP 3 is extraordinarily lower in vivo (17,18). It has been shown that the sensitivity of the Purkinje cell IP 3 R is similar to those of other cells when analyzed in isolation, leading to the hypothesis that the reduced sensitivity is due to interference by an inhibiting protein found in Purkinje cells (19,20). The physiological significance of these properties in terms of Ca 21 release before the onset of LTD is unclear at this time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%