2016
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2580
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endocrine disruption: where are we with hazard and risk assessment?

Abstract: 24Approaches to assessing endocrine disruptors (EDs) differ across the globe, with some 25 regulatory environments using a hazard-based approach, while others employ risk-based and scenarios whereby a hazard-based approach might be most appropriate were discussed. 32Three case studies for ED assessment, one for an industrial chemical, one for a pharmaceutical,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the EU, the process of determination of MRLs for natural hormones in food has not started yet. Furthermore, although there is a broad consensus of the importance of this problematic area the regulatory defi nition of endocrine disruption is not agreed upon [10]. Some of the recommended values for hormones in foodstuff were established by the EU reference laboratory for residua [11], predominantly due to control of the use of prohibited hormonal growth promoters (Table 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EU, the process of determination of MRLs for natural hormones in food has not started yet. Furthermore, although there is a broad consensus of the importance of this problematic area the regulatory defi nition of endocrine disruption is not agreed upon [10]. Some of the recommended values for hormones in foodstuff were established by the EU reference laboratory for residua [11], predominantly due to control of the use of prohibited hormonal growth promoters (Table 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%