2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0918-04.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endocannabinoids Inhibit Transmission at Granule Cell to Purkinje Cell Synapses by Modulating Three Types of Presynaptic Calcium Channels

Abstract: At many central synapses, endocannabinoids released by postsynaptic cells inhibit neurotransmitter release by activating presynaptic cannabinoid receptors. The mechanisms underlying this important means of synaptic regulation are not fully understood. It has been shown at several synapses that endocannabinoids inhibit neurotransmitter release by reducing calcium influx into presynaptic terminals. One hypothesis maintains that endocannabinoids indirectly reduce calcium influx by modulating potassium channels an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
121
3
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
121
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, however, the cannabimimetic agonists act directly on the Ca v 3 channel isoforms and independently of CB1R activation. Also the lack of effects on R-type channels is in agreement with previous works reporting no action on somatic R-type channels in central neurons [22,38] but it is at variance with the observation that presynaptic R-type channels are effectively inhibited by cannabimimetic agonists at the granule cell-Purkinje neuron synapses [39]. These contrasting results reflect most likely the heterogeneous nature of neuronal R-type channels [40].…”
Section: L-type Versus Non-l-type Channel Modulation By Cannabinoidssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this case, however, the cannabimimetic agonists act directly on the Ca v 3 channel isoforms and independently of CB1R activation. Also the lack of effects on R-type channels is in agreement with previous works reporting no action on somatic R-type channels in central neurons [22,38] but it is at variance with the observation that presynaptic R-type channels are effectively inhibited by cannabimimetic agonists at the granule cell-Purkinje neuron synapses [39]. These contrasting results reflect most likely the heterogeneous nature of neuronal R-type channels [40].…”
Section: L-type Versus Non-l-type Channel Modulation By Cannabinoidssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Because acute activation of CB1R located presynaptically on PFs modulates granule cell synaptic release (Takahashi and Linden, 2000;Brown et al, 2004;Daniel et al, 2004), we investigated whether chronic cannabinoid treatment would alter PF-PC synaptic properties. The relationship between excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSCs) amplitudes (output) as a function of PF stimulus intensity (input) for each neuron was compared in cerebellar slices prepared from mice chronically exposed to THC (10 mg/kg) or to its vehicle ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulation of glutamate is required for the activation of mGluR1-mediated EPSCs in PCs (Batchelor and Garthwaite, 1993;Tempia et al, 1998;Brown et al, 2004). We evaluated whether the induction of slow mGluR1-mediated EPSCs was facilitated in tolerant mice by delivering a highfrequency train of stimuli to PFs (e.g., 1-10 stimuli at 100 Hz) in the presence of ionotropic GABA and glutamate antagonists (100 M picrotoxin, 40 M DL-APV, 20 M DNQX).…”
Section: Facilitated Induction Of Slow Metabotropic Glutamate Receptomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximal inhibition was reached after B20 min. It has been repeatedly observed in the past that the effects of cannabinoids develop slowly in brain slices, probably due to the high lipophilicity of cannabinoids (Szabo et al, 1998;Brown et al, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of the Exogenous Cannabinoid Agonist Win55212-2 On Gamentioning
confidence: 99%