2019
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1668974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-user and clinician perspectives on the viability of wearable functional electrical stimulation garments after stroke and spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work identified the need for assistance as a barrier for adherence and use of this device in the home and is consistent with our study that identified the ability to set up and use independently as a critical consideration in the desire to use at home. Moineau [17] introduced a functional electrical stimulation device to clinicians and people with SCI and stroke, though, participants were not able to trial. Their qualitative exploration results were similar in that end-users described the interaction between their own physical and mental characteristics that would influence technology benefit and their willingness to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work identified the need for assistance as a barrier for adherence and use of this device in the home and is consistent with our study that identified the ability to set up and use independently as a critical consideration in the desire to use at home. Moineau [17] introduced a functional electrical stimulation device to clinicians and people with SCI and stroke, though, participants were not able to trial. Their qualitative exploration results were similar in that end-users described the interaction between their own physical and mental characteristics that would influence technology benefit and their willingness to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimise the risk appropriate electrode size should be considered to allow for sufficient heat dissipation (for calculations see, Butterwick et al, 2007). These concerns are common concerns reported amongst participants and should be addressed to maximise comfort and participant retention rates (Moineau et al, 2021), as well as to prevent Joule-heating from inducing systematic psychological bias.…”
Section: Safety Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics that would detract from usability and wearability included difficult set-up, discomfort, prolonged calibration, and other flaws that could ultimately stymy the uptake of future devices. Other research on the development of wearable devices for stroke or other populations list similar design flaws to this effect [43,52,53]. Thus, for the development of any future wearable monitoring technology, it is important to thoroughly consider the ways in which a device may or may not be usable or wearable.…”
Section: Barriers To Adopting Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%