2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-to-End generation of Multiple-Choice questions using Text-to-Text transfer Transformer models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Older papers are excluded from the search criteria. Most of them used automated evaluation tools [4][5] [6] [14] [17] or they used automated contexts for programming languages [20] [21] [15]. It was also identified that generating feedback for the questions produced to teach programming languages are equally important.…”
Section: Research Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Older papers are excluded from the search criteria. Most of them used automated evaluation tools [4][5] [6] [14] [17] or they used automated contexts for programming languages [20] [21] [15]. It was also identified that generating feedback for the questions produced to teach programming languages are equally important.…”
Section: Research Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [13] used programming-by-example for code snippets that was a test regulated by synthesis. Recently, the research article [15] provided facts for generating questions for teaching programming languages. The study reported in [16] found that students are taught by teachers to produce a program but they are not fully sure about the use of their own codes as they failed to grasp basic concepts.…”
Section: B Automatic Question Generation In Teaching Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations