IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2004.1493253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-to-end failover thresholds for transport layer multihoming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect of a lower PMR has also been shown in extensive simulation studies by Caro et al [2004aCaro et al [ , 2006a. They do not specifically consider signaling environments, but rather a general Internet setting, and also use considerably larger path-propagation delays.…”
Section: Failover Detection and Failovermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The positive effect of a lower PMR has also been shown in extensive simulation studies by Caro et al [2004aCaro et al [ , 2006a. They do not specifically consider signaling environments, but rather a general Internet setting, and also use considerably larger path-propagation delays.…”
Section: Failover Detection and Failovermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hence, they might introduce a path-bouncing effect in which the sender keeps changing the data transmission path frequently. This sounds harmful to the data transfer; however, several research results indicate that there is no serious problem with SCTP in terms of the path-bouncing effect (see [CARO04] and [CARO05]). …”
Section: Security Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement of this behaviour may be achieved by reducing the PMR value. As it was shown in [8], the faster performance is traded off against a probability of spurious failovers, or even permanent oscillations between the available addresses (pingpong effect), if the PMR value is decreased too much.…”
Section: B Analytical Failover Time Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%