2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2014.6952872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-to-end delay analysis in wireless sensor networks with service vacation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike [10], in our work we combine the contention phase (FSA protocol) with the contention-free phase (TDMA scheduling) and derive an exact expression for the E2E delay. In [11] the E2E analysis of a chain of K non-preemptive nodes from sensor to the sink is investigated. Poisson arrival rate and exponential service time are assumed for high (control) and low (data) priority traffic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, unlike [10], in our work we combine the contention phase (FSA protocol) with the contention-free phase (TDMA scheduling) and derive an exact expression for the E2E delay. In [11] the E2E analysis of a chain of K non-preemptive nodes from sensor to the sink is investigated. Poisson arrival rate and exponential service time are assumed for high (control) and low (data) priority traffic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with c r max = 1; c k = 1 + #CH k+1 #CH k c k+1 , for k < r max . (11) being #CH k the number of CHs at ring k. Table 5 shows the values of c k for several sizes of the WSN (r max = 0, 1, 2, . .…”
Section: The Traffic Load and The Stability Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of the related work, such as [22] and [23], the delay characteristics of the system were inferred from analyzing the queue lengths and their first moments (or mean queue lengths and waiting times). Some of these related work, such as [24], were limited to only evaluating the average waiting times. While these results may provide a good estimate of the system's overall performance, they do not necessarily yield accurate results in terms of the SU's waiting-time behaviors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%