1997
DOI: 10.1080/01977261.1997.11754534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End Scraper Morphology and Use-Life: An Approach for Studying Paleoindian Lithic Technology And Mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of residential moves structures how groups stay supplied with tools and raw materials in anticipation of future needs, and thus more residentially mobile groups tend to exhibit greater economization of raw materials to overcome periods where raw material availability is unpredictable [50]. As a result, there is often greater reduction intensity (the amount of use prior to discard) among stone tools (particularly scrapers) and cores with an increased distance from their source, demonstrated for Late Pleistocene-Holocene foragers in Eurasia, North America, Australia, Africa and elsewhere [50,[54][55][56][57]. We test this hypothesis for cores and retouched tools (points, backed microliths and endscrapers) from Nasera, examining temporal trends in artefact size and the ratio of local : non-local raw materials for both cores and tools.…”
Section: (Iii) Artefact Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of residential moves structures how groups stay supplied with tools and raw materials in anticipation of future needs, and thus more residentially mobile groups tend to exhibit greater economization of raw materials to overcome periods where raw material availability is unpredictable [50]. As a result, there is often greater reduction intensity (the amount of use prior to discard) among stone tools (particularly scrapers) and cores with an increased distance from their source, demonstrated for Late Pleistocene-Holocene foragers in Eurasia, North America, Australia, Africa and elsewhere [50,[54][55][56][57]. We test this hypothesis for cores and retouched tools (points, backed microliths and endscrapers) from Nasera, examining temporal trends in artefact size and the ratio of local : non-local raw materials for both cores and tools.…”
Section: (Iii) Artefact Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahler 1989;Austin 1997;Bradbury and Carr 1999;e.g. Bradley 1975;Flenniken 1981;Newcomer 1971;Odell 1989;Patterson 1982Patterson , 1990Patterson and Sollberger 1978;Shott 1996;Stahle and Dunn 1984;Steffen et al 1998;Baulmer and Downum 1989;Bradbury 1998;Bradbury and Carr 1999;Morrow 1997;Prentiss 1998;Prentiss and Romanski 1989;Root 1997;Shott 1994;Sullivan and Rozen 1985). Unfortunately, these analyses generally fail to demonstrate that the stages followed experimentally were those followed in the creation of the archaeological assemblage (as might be demonstrated through refitting for example) (Hiscock 1988;Newcomer 1975:98;Schindler et al 1984), or that the debitage resulting from each step can be reliably identified in archaeological contexts.…”
Section: Modelling Flake Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view sees production strategies as rarely involving a simple linear sequence of activities with predictable results, but rather an "expanding array of alternatives defined by intervening options and outcomes" (Bleed 1991:20). Others still have used sequence models to expose the non-reality of essentialist typologies by demonstrating the existence of underlying morphological continuums (Clarkson 2002a(Clarkson , 2005Attenbrow 2002, 2003;Morrow 1997). Bleed (2001) sees different approaches to sequence modelling as falling into one of two categories, which he calls 'teleological' and 'evolutionary'.…”
Section: Reduction Sequence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meltzer 2009. Sur les premiers Américains, voir, entre autres, Dillehay 2000, Haynes 2002, Goebel et al 2008, Bradley et al 2010, Meltzer 2009et Perrot-Minnot 2013b archéologique, ni aucun type d'artefact (si l'on excepte Trinidad), n'ont pu être irréfutablement attribués aux temps paléoindiens dans les Antilles ; ainsi, les pointes de projectiles bifaciales (Figure 2) et les grattoirs unifaciaux paléoindiens (Morrow 1997) . Cette hypothèse est confortée par la distribution des pointes du type Queue de Poisson en Amérique Centrale ; on s'aperçoit en effet que dans l'isthme, ce type de pointe, très représenté en Amé-rique du Sud, est surtout associé à la façade Atlantique 32 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified