2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-organ Function in Patients on Long-term Circulatory Support With Continuous- or Pulsatile-flow Assist Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies demonstrate either stable to improved renal function after implantation of continuousflow LVADs for periods up to 3.7 years (11,19,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). In contrast, Hasin et al reported on 83 patients who received a continuous-flow LVAD as either BTT or DT (47).…”
Section: Continuous Blood Flow and Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies demonstrate either stable to improved renal function after implantation of continuousflow LVADs for periods up to 3.7 years (11,19,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). In contrast, Hasin et al reported on 83 patients who received a continuous-flow LVAD as either BTT or DT (47).…”
Section: Continuous Blood Flow and Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanders et al compared CF-and PF-VAD patients and found comparable improvements from baseline at 12 weeks. Other small studies have confirmed the same up to 15-month follow-up, 15 though the baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-especially in those on PF-VADs-was much better in these studies when compared to the Sanders study. Longer-term…”
Section: Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…56 Studies comparing changes between CF-and PF-VADs have not found a significant difference in such improvements. 15 The mechanism of formation of arteriovenous (AV) malformations in the gut is detailed elsewhere, but the role of pulsatility loss and possibly local endothelial factors such as VEGF and vWF in the formation of vascular malformations is not well established. In a single-center study, we did not find any association between the extent of aortic valve opening (as a surrogate marker of pulse pressure) and clinically significant gastrointestinal AV malformations.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several investigators reported that continuous flow (CF) LVAD support for extended durations will be as safe and effective in patients with pre-implant multiorgan failure (MOF) as pulsatile flow LVAD. 4, 5 Yoshioka et al reported that the cumulative survival curve after LVAD implantation mainly depends on the existence of renal dysfunction rather than on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. 6 Therefore, LVAD implantation should be considered without delay if further deterioration of end-organ dysfunction is noted even with ECMO support.…”
Section: Article P 96mentioning
confidence: 99%