2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-of-life decision before and after birth: changing ethical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4,5,7,18,19,20 Our mortality rates, however, might have been confounded by withholding medical treatment from these infants given the dual risks of major chromosomal anomaly and VLBW. Although offering intensive management for infants with T21 is standard treatment, 21,22 the decision to implement or continue invasive or other life-sustaining procedures among infants with T18 or T13 is a complex decision dependent on input from the family, family supporters, involved healthcare workers and sometimes bioethicists and/or independent guardians of the infant. Although some have indicated that cardiac surgery is not appropriate for these infants as they die of conditions unrelated to their cardiac defects, 5,20,23 others have argued that cardiac surgery and the related intensive treatment are ethically acceptable as they can alleviate their symptoms and prolong their survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,5,7,18,19,20 Our mortality rates, however, might have been confounded by withholding medical treatment from these infants given the dual risks of major chromosomal anomaly and VLBW. Although offering intensive management for infants with T21 is standard treatment, 21,22 the decision to implement or continue invasive or other life-sustaining procedures among infants with T18 or T13 is a complex decision dependent on input from the family, family supporters, involved healthcare workers and sometimes bioethicists and/or independent guardians of the infant. Although some have indicated that cardiac surgery is not appropriate for these infants as they die of conditions unrelated to their cardiac defects, 5,20,23 others have argued that cardiac surgery and the related intensive treatment are ethically acceptable as they can alleviate their symptoms and prolong their survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly phrased as above, the neonatal intensive care bioethical dilemma's resolution may be reached within a frame of two opposing positions: the intrinsic value of human life on the one hand and the quality of life on the other [14][15][16][17]. For the supporters of the intrinsic value of human life position, life should be protected by all means and at any cost, irrespective of its quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the termination of pregnancy has been performed in many European countries, even after 24 weeks of pregnancy, because of the presence of fetal abnormalities, because fetal abnormalities are clearly characterized as one of the indications for terminating the pregnancy [4,14,15]. Pinter [16] described the guidelines for surgical treatments by dividing fetuses and neonates into 6 groups according to the severity of their malformations from patients who are likely to be completely cured by surgery to the patients who have malformations that are not compatible with leading a healthy life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%