54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronaut 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.iac-03-iaa.5.4.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-of-Life de -Orbiting Strategies for Satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use that model in STK to generate the decay lifetime of a Cubesat starting from 180 km, which is the minimum height for a LEO satellite. The results will be verified with statistics acquired through open literature [14], [15]. A summary of the decay lifetime is shown in Table II.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We use that model in STK to generate the decay lifetime of a Cubesat starting from 180 km, which is the minimum height for a LEO satellite. The results will be verified with statistics acquired through open literature [14], [15]. A summary of the decay lifetime is shown in Table II.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A set of 2 x 4 reaction control thrusters (RCTs) for orbit maintenance and slew maneuvers after the perigee measurement phase is used as part of the chemical propulsion system (CPS) together with 1 x 6 Orbit Control thrusters (OCTs) for de-orbiting. The latter is becoming a stringent requirement for future mission designs to avoid uncontrolled growth of space debris and reduce the risk of potential collisions between debris and intact spacecraft [40,41]. The Micro-Propulsion System (MPS) is based on GAIA heritage [42] and primarily used for attitude control, employing a set of 2x8 micro-proportional thrusters to this purpose.…”
Section: Spacecraft Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not constitute a limitation for small spacecraft as the associated casualty area is small, and thus the location of the entry point is irrelevant. On the other hand, large spacecraft are characterized by large casualty area and the constraint on casualty risk can be met only if the re-entry occurs in low-density populated areas (Janovsky et al, 2004). As long as the action of drag does not completely circularise the orbit during the last phase of disposal, it is reasonable to assume that re-entry will occur in the proximity of the pericenter.…”
Section: Earth Re-entrymentioning
confidence: 99%