2018
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-of-Life Conversations and Hospice Placement: Association With Less Aggressive Care Desired in the Nursing Home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the known benefits, ACP is rarely a component of usual practice in LTC [13,14]. Key barriers to ACP engagement include lack of resident and family preparedness [15,16], limited staff time, and discomfort and uncertainties from all parties regarding what to discuss beyond single medical decisions and funeral planning [17][18][19][20]. ACP programs that include multiple steps have shown some successful outcomes in increasing ACP engagement in LTC [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the known benefits, ACP is rarely a component of usual practice in LTC [13,14]. Key barriers to ACP engagement include lack of resident and family preparedness [15,16], limited staff time, and discomfort and uncertainties from all parties regarding what to discuss beyond single medical decisions and funeral planning [17][18][19][20]. ACP programs that include multiple steps have shown some successful outcomes in increasing ACP engagement in LTC [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missed conversations tend to occur when neither NH staff nor FCs recognize that a resident's clinical condition is changing, or when either party assumes to know the resident's end‐of‐life care preferences (Auriemma et al, 2022; Towsley et al, 2015). Studies have shown missed opportunities for end‐of‐life communication with physicians, who are often viewed by FCs as “missing in action” (Shield et al, 2005,), and little inclusion of FCs in care plan meetings (Reinhardt et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its relevance and the available qualitative (Bollig et al., 2016; Caron et al., 2005; Frey, Foster, Boyd, Robinson, & Gott, 2017) and quantitative studies (Mitchell et al, 2017; Reinhardt, Downes, Cimarolli, & Bomba, 2017; van Soest‐Poortvliet et al., 2014) on NH residents, relatives and HCPs communication, the challenges encountered during the research process as experienced by researchers have never been addressed to date. Discussing and reporting issues in designing and implementing study protocols about sensitive topics can increase a researcher's awareness, as well as can suggest how to design further studies to overcome challenges and to promote ethically and methodologically sound studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%