End of life care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

Abstract

BackgroundEnd of life (EoL) care in sub-Saharan Africa still lacks the sound evidence-base needed for the development of effective, appropriate service provision. It is essential to make evidence from all types of research available alongside clinical and health service data, to ensure that EoL care is ethical and culturally appropriate. This article aims to synthesize qualitative research on EoL care in sub-Saharan Africa to inform policy, practice and further research. It seeks to identify areas of existing research; describe findings specifically relevant to the African context; and, identify areas lacking evidence.MethodsRelevant literature was identified through eight electronic databases: AMED, British Nursing Index & Archive, CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and the Social Sciences Citation Index; and hand searches. Inclusion criteria were: published qualitative or mixed-method studies in sub-Saharan Africa, about EoL care. Study quality was assessed using a standard grading scale. Relevant data including findings and practice recommendations were extracted and compared in tabular format.ResultsOf the 407 articles initially identified, 51 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Nineteen came from South Africa and the majority (38) focused on HIV/AIDS. Nine dealt with multiple or unspecified conditions and four were about cancer. Study respondents included health professionals, informal carers, patients, community members and bereaved relatives. Informal carers were typically women, the elderly and children, providing total care in the home, and lacking support from professionals or the extended family. Twenty studies focused on home-based care, describing how programmes function in practice and what is needed to make them effective. Patients and carers were reported to prefer institutional care but this needs to be understood in context. Studies focusing on culture discussed good and bad death, culture-specific approaches to symptoms and illness, and the bereavement process.ConclusionsThe data support or complement the findings from quantitative research. The review prompts a reconsideration of the assumption that in Africa the extended family care for the sick, and that people prefer home-based care. The review identifies areas relevant for a research agenda on socio-cultural issues at the EoL in sub-Saharan Africa.

Palliative Care, Suffering, Death Trajectory: A View of End-of-Life Care (EOL) Related Issues in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

“…luded to SSA community support network [23] means that the growing needs of carers involved in SSA palliative care delivery must also be taken into account.…”

Fardeau des maladies chroniques en Afrique subsaharienne : plaidoyer pour une mise en place des soins palliatifs et d’accompagnement en fin de vie en République démocratique du Congo

“…Certains médecins à Kinshasa disent tout simplement au malade en état palliatif de retourner à domicile. Par manque des moyens financiers, les personnes préfèrent mourir à domicile [57][58][59]. Devant ces maladies sans solution de prise en charge appropriée dans nos systèmes de santé, les soins palliatifs sont à encourager au sein de la communauté pour cette réalité et problème de santé publique.…”

Common or multiple futures for end of life care around the world? Ideas from the ‘waiting room of history’

“…The situation varies from informal family-based palliative care alone, to isolated clinical care service levels, to the ‘advanced integration’ of palliative care within mainstream health systems, albeit with only 22 countries in this latter category. In the vast majority of developing countries, there are only meagre levels of institutional palliative care and there is limited or no evidence of its recognition in health policy and a scarcity of specifically trained personnel to support it (Gysels et al., 2011, Bingley and Clark, 2009, McDermott et al., 2008, Callaway et al., 2007). The overall picture is one of striking variation in palliative care provision across the globe (Clark, 2010).…”