Enculturating the Science of International Development: Beyond the WEIRD Independent Paradigm

Abstract

Initiatives in international development and behavioral science rely predominantly on the independent models of the self and agency that are prevalent in individualist Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) cultural contexts. Programs that are guided by these independent models, explicitly or implicitly, as the default way of being and that neglect interdependent models can reduce the potential of development initiatives to advance poverty reduction and well-being in two ways. First, programs based solely on independent models of agency—centered on personal goals and values; self-advancement and self-expression; and autonomy—can limit the scope and effectiveness of the development science toolkit. Second, programs that are not responsive to interdependent ways of being—centered on relational goals and values; responsiveness to social norms, roles, and obligations; and social coordination—that are common in many Global South sociocultural contexts can be met with resistance or backlash. We propose that taking account of interdependent psychosocial tendencies is a promising way to diversify the behavioral science toolkit and to build a more comprehensive science of human behavior. Furthermore, culturally responsive program designs have the potential both to promote decolonized, inclusive approaches that preserve rather than override local ways of being and to enable diverse trajectories of societal development to flourish. We integrate experimental and descriptive research from psychology, economics, education, and global health to suggest how models of interdependent agency can be productively integrated into development program designs to advance quality of life in locally resonant ways.

Is it okay to feel this way? Exploring the joint effect of emotional experiences and expectations on life satisfaction

“…The present sample, which comprises only of online participants from the United States, imposes limitations on the extent to which the findings can be generalized. In order to adequately address the variances in emotional norms and expectations across different cultures and in a culturally sensitive way (Badaan and Choucair, 2023 ; Thomas and Markus, 2023 ), it is crucial to incorporate multiple cultural contexts into the future research agenda.…”

WEIRD–Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology’s evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.

“…If empirical evidence is lacking for certain regions, then special interest should be directed at such cases, and the scientific community—especially editors and reviewers—should remain open to findings coming from such understudied cultures that contrast with dominant or common theorizing. To repeat two candidates for such a review: there are already first strong signals available that cultural variation in self-construals may be more nuanced than has been commonly assumed for the last 30 years (see Kitayama & Salvador, 2023; Krys et al, 2022; Thomas & Markus, 2023), and further research on self-construals beyond WEIRD and Confucian cultures is needed. A similar approach may be needed for common theorizing on analytic and holistic thinking (see Uskul, Kirchner-Häusler, et al, 2023).…”

The motivating effect of monetary over psychological incentives is stronger in WEIRD cultures

“…Researchers have warned against indiscriminately exporting interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in North America or Western Europe to other world regions 11 – 17 . Yet so far, most interventions have rarely been tested outside of Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) 18 cultures 19 – 21 .…”