2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137290205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encounters between Analytic and Continental Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have concluded the analytic-continental split itself is a false or obsolete dichotomy (Beaney, 2013;Vrahimis, 2013). For example, Beaney suggests the analytic tradition can be simply defined by its toolbox of methods and its breaking down of problems into smaller problems which anybody can work on democratically, rather than having a grand doctrine or ideology that needs to be accepted as a dogmatic whole.…”
Section: Continental or Analytic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have concluded the analytic-continental split itself is a false or obsolete dichotomy (Beaney, 2013;Vrahimis, 2013). For example, Beaney suggests the analytic tradition can be simply defined by its toolbox of methods and its breaking down of problems into smaller problems which anybody can work on democratically, rather than having a grand doctrine or ideology that needs to be accepted as a dogmatic whole.…”
Section: Continental or Analytic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…97-154); O'Neil and Uebel ( 2004)). By contrast, Ayer's use of Carnap's arguments, at first in a brief mention against Heidegger and later also applied against Sartre, would function as justification for Anglophone analytic philosophers not to engage with such thinkers (see Vrahimis 2013aVrahimis , 2013b. Interestingly, they did not function as such for Ayer himself, who would produce a number of critical commentaries on various so-called 'continental' philosophers throughout his life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of continental philosophers to whom he responded includes not only Heidegger but also, among others, Husserl, Sartre, and Merleau-Ponty; seeVrahimis (2013aVrahimis ( , 2013b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further analyses of the close relations between the respective positions of Carnap and Heidegger, see(Stone 2006),(Gabriel 2009),(Vrahimis 2013). 4 In the wake of Friedman's seminal work, many have argued that the cultural, sociological and political components of the divide were at least as significant and influential as its strictly philosophical terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%