Encounters and Extended Collaborative Creativity: Mobilization of Cultural Resources in the Development of a Functional Food Product

Miettinen, Reijo; Lehenkari, Janne

doi:10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_13

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results could be explained by the administration of live bacterial cells in the colitis mouse group, which have weaker immune systems, induced different responses with the administration of live bacteria cells in healthy mouse group, although the administration of live bacterial cells relieved the colitis symptoms. As mentioned before, previous studies comparing viable bacterial cells vs nonviable cells suggest that both bacterial cells have the same effect or that viable bacterial cells have a stronger effect than nonviable bacterial cells (Haller 2015;Miettinen and Lehenkari 2016). Our study reveals that both L67 and PPL67 similarly suppress the colitis symptoms in DSS-treated mice.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

“…However, the strain did not improve significantly the DAI and histologic damage of colon tissue in the mouse colitis model. Some studies show that live bacteria have a more immunostimulatory effect than inactivated bacteria (Haller 2015; Miettinen and Lehenkari 2016). By contrast, some studies suggested that the effect of the paraprobiotics cells was similar to the effect of probiotics on immunomodulatory properties (Arai et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L67 probiotics vs paraprobiotics for reducing pro‐inflammatory responses in colitis mice

Song

Jeong

Lim

et al. 2022

Int J of Dairy Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Probiotics improve intestinal symptoms and reduce damage in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, live bacteria are not consistently effective for IBD patients because of their weaker immune system and damaged intestinal epithelial cells. This study compared the suppression effect of probiotic (L67) and paraprobiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L67 (PPL67) cells on dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)‐treated Institute of Cancer Research mice. The results showed that the administration of PPL67 to DSS‐treated mice mitigated the symptoms of colitis as evidenced by reductions in DAI define levels and the pro‐inflammatory factors. So, these results indicate that L. plantarum L67 may prevent the pathogenesis of chronic colitis in a safer and more stable way.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L67 probiotics vs paraprobiotics for reducing pro‐inflammatory responses in colitis mice

Song

Jeong

Lim

et al. 2022

Int J of Dairy Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ambitious goal of producing an innovation requires multidisciplinary collaboration to produce a large number of high-quality original ideas and to develop the competence needed in such versatile and multistage work. The multidisciplinary composition of teams in innovation networks allows for the complementarity of competence (Miettinen and Lehenkari, 2016).…”

Section: Towards Individual Innovation Competencementioning

confidence: 99%

Validating an individual innovation competence assessment tool for university–industry collaboration

Hero¹,

Pitkäjärvi²,

Matinheikki-Kokko

2021

Industry and Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

University–industry collaboration produces networks that may be capable of innovations, such as novel products and services. The collaboration projects also need to benefit student learning, yet teachers have little clarity with regard to innovation competence development. Individual innovation competence is a set of personal characteristics, knowledge, skills and attitudes that are connected to create concretised and implemented novelties via collaboration in complex innovation processes. The paper reports on the findings from the development and validation of an individual innovation competence assessment tool. The aim is to determine which individual innovation competences are significant in university–industry collaboration and which of these competences are sensitive to educational interventions. The study used a three-phase method involving development of the questionnaire items, validation in teacher and student panels, and a pilot pre- and post-survey study. All seven domains of individual innovation competences were significant and sensitive to educational intervention (a multidisciplinary innovation project conducted with industry). The most responsive competence domains regarding change were concretisation and implementation planning skills, and project management skills. The paper concludes with application opportunities for the tool and recommendations for further research.

show abstract

Encounters and Extended Collaborative Creativity: Mobilization of Cultural Resources in the Development of a Functional Food Product

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L67 probiotics vs paraprobiotics for reducing pro‐inflammatory responses in colitis mice

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L67 probiotics vs paraprobiotics for reducing pro‐inflammatory responses in colitis mice

Validating an individual innovation competence assessment tool for university–industry collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About