2006
DOI: 10.1086/501044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encounter‐triggered Disk Mass Loss in the Orion Nebula Cluster

Abstract: The relevance of encounters on the destruction of protoplanetary discs in the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC) is investigated by combining two different types of numerical simulation. First, star-cluster simulations are performed to model the stellar dynamics of the ONC, the results of which are used to investigate the frequency of encounters, the mass ratio and separation of the stars involved, and the eccentricity of the encounter orbits. The results show that interactions that could influence the star-surroundin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
139
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(12) will be evaluated for three different stellar masses, representing stellar mass groups of low-, intermediate-and high-mass stars. Appropriate typical interaction radii have been taken from Table 3 of Olczak et al (2006). The set of masses m , radii r enc , and "encounter escape speeds" v enc resulting from Eq.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical Results and Analytical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(12) will be evaluated for three different stellar masses, representing stellar mass groups of low-, intermediate-and high-mass stars. Appropriate typical interaction radii have been taken from Table 3 of Olczak et al (2006). The set of masses m , radii r enc , and "encounter escape speeds" v enc resulting from Eq.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical Results and Analytical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…minimum 3 % disc-mass loss, cf. Olczak et al 2006), the light grey those that removed at least 50 % of the discmass, while the dark grey stands for the most destructive encounters that caused a disc-mass loss of at least 90 %. The two plots show the distributions for the model D4.…”
Section: Validation Of the Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Johnstone et al 1998;Störzer & Hollenbach 1999;Scally & Clarke 2002;Matsuyama et al 2003;Johnstone et al 2004;Adams et al 2006;Alexander et al 2006;Ercolano et al 2008;Gorti & Hollenbach 2009;Drake et al 2009) and stellar fly-bys or gravitational stripping (see e.g. Clarke & Pringle 1993;Scally & Clarke 2002;Pfalzner 2004;Adams et al 2006;Olczak et al 2006Olczak et al , 2010Pfalzner & Olczak 2007;Craig & Krumholz 2013;Rosotti et al 2014). From observations, the sizes of protoplanetary discs are usually determined by fitting the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) to disc models using a truncated power-law (Andrews & Williams 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They derived the disc size assuming that all material outside the Lagrangian point between the two stars is stripped from the disc. Furthermore, they suggested to convert the formula for disc-mass loss for parabolic, coplanar encounters reported by Olczak et al (2006) directly into an upper limit for disc truncation, assuming a mass-density distribution within the disc of Σ = r −1 . The few previous studies that considered disc sizes in stellar cluster environments (Adams et al 2006;Malmberg et al 2011;Pfalzner 2013) generalised, for lack of a universal description of disc sizes, the results obtained for equal-mass encounter by Kobayashi & Ida (2001) to non-equal mass encounters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%