2019
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2019.2906582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding Visual Sensitivity by MaxPol Convolution Filters for Image Sharpness Assessment

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel design of Human Visual System (HVS) response in a convolutional filter form to decompose meaningful features that are closely tied with image sharpness level. No-reference (NR) Image sharpness assessment (ISA) techniques have emerged as the standard of image quality assessment in diverse imaging applications. Despite their high correlation with subjective scoring, they are challenging for practical considerations due to high computational cost and lack of scalability across di… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better verify the obvious superiority of our proposed NQMDP model, we compared NQMDP with ten state-of-the-art relevant IQA models, which include five classes: (1) evaluation methods for NSIs including NFERM [5] and HOSA [14]; (2) evaluation methods for image sharpness including ARISMC [43] and HVS [44]; (3) evaluation methods for image contrast including NIQMC [8] and BIQME [6]; (4) evaluation methods without opinion scores including NIQE [13] and SNP-NIQE [15]; (5) evaluation methods for SCIs including BQMS [18] and ASIQE [19]. In order to fairly compare the performance of all the above algorithms, we used the five metrics recommended by the video quality expert group [45].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to better verify the obvious superiority of our proposed NQMDP model, we compared NQMDP with ten state-of-the-art relevant IQA models, which include five classes: (1) evaluation methods for NSIs including NFERM [5] and HOSA [14]; (2) evaluation methods for image sharpness including ARISMC [43] and HVS [44]; (3) evaluation methods for image contrast including NIQMC [8] and BIQME [6]; (4) evaluation methods without opinion scores including NIQE [13] and SNP-NIQE [15]; (5) evaluation methods for SCIs including BQMS [18] and ASIQE [19]. In order to fairly compare the performance of all the above algorithms, we used the five metrics recommended by the video quality expert group [45].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the scatter plot of the NQMDP model is more slender than the scatter plot of the NIQE model (second place). ( 2 [5], HOSA [14], ARISMC [43], HVS [44], NIQMC [8], BIQME [6], NIQE [13], SNP−NIQE [15], and our NQMDP on DPQAD database.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A specific type of NR-IQA methods of high relevance are NR image sharpness assessment (NR-ISA) methods that are designed specifically for evaluating image blur or sharpness. Most of these methods are based on domain knowledge, including human visual system (HVS) [13], [14], Fourier phase [15], complex wavelet domain phase coherence [16], local variation [17], and sparse image representation [18] models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a percentage fusion strategy was utilized to predict the overall sharpness score. Hosseini et al designed an HVS-related filter (HVS-MaxPol) to extract blur-sensitive features [11], the high-order center moment after image filtering was calculated as the sharpness score. This method utilizes HVS characteristics more effectively and achieves high accuracy on both synthetically and real blurred image databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%