1991
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880010404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding strategies for three‐direction phase‐contrast MR imaging of flow

Abstract: Three encoding strategies for the measurement of flow velocities in arbitrary directions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging are presented; their noise and dynamic range performance are compared by means of theoretical analysis and computer simulation. A six-point measurement strategy is shown to be quite inefficient in terms of velocity variance per unit time. A simple four-point method exhibits equal dynamic range; its noise depends on flow direction but on average is equal to that of the six-poin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
319
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
319
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Total CBF was quantified by PC MRI, 8 a standard technique for measuring blood flow velocity in the SSS, from which CBF was calculated by multiplying average velocity in the vessel by the cross-sectional area. As the SSS is known to drain 45% of the total brain blood volume, 18,19 it is Figure 1.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Total CBF was quantified by PC MRI, 8 a standard technique for measuring blood flow velocity in the SSS, from which CBF was calculated by multiplying average velocity in the vessel by the cross-sectional area. As the SSS is known to drain 45% of the total brain blood volume, 18,19 it is Figure 1.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence used was a segmented 3D TFE (Turbo Field Echo) radiofrequency-and gradient-spoiled sequence with a Hadamard four-point velocity encoding strategy using a maximal gradient strength of 20 mT m -1 and a gradient slew rate of 100 mT m -1 ms -1 (29,30). Further sequence parameters were:…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1): 1) the midsagittal slice to view the major CSF pathways; 2) an axial slice across the middle of the LV to investigate the LV volumetric change; 3) an axial slice across the junction between the AS and V4 to measure the CSF flow rate; 4) a midcoronal slice at V3 to measure the CSF flow rate; and 5) an axial slice nearly perpendicular to the basilar artery in the prepontine region to measure the blood flow rate. For the first two locations, velocities in all three directions were measured to investigate the flow dynamics based on the simple four-point method (11). Images at 16 equidistant time frames were reconstructed per cardiac cycle.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Velocity Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter three locations, only the velocity perpendicular to the slice of interest was measured so that data could be collected with a higher temporal resolution. The simple two-point method was used to calculate the velocity (11). Images at 32 equidistant time frames were reconstructed per cardiac cycle.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Velocity Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%