2008
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2008.2007025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoderless Predictive Direct Torque Control for Synchronous Reluctance Machines at Very Low and Zero Speed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, primitives that are very close 1 to the current state of the end-effector should be considered to be more reliable 2 than further away primitives. To take this important information into account, it is possible to apply instead a weighted least squares approach for solving (7). The idea is to put different weights w 1 .…”
Section: Proposed Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, primitives that are very close 1 to the current state of the end-effector should be considered to be more reliable 2 than further away primitives. To take this important information into account, it is possible to apply instead a weighted least squares approach for solving (7). The idea is to put different weights w 1 .…”
Section: Proposed Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iqbal analyzes dynamic performance of a vector-controlled five-phase synchronous reluctance motor drive by using an experimental investigation [27]. Morales and Pacas design an encoderless predictive direct torque control for synchronous reluctance machines at very low and zero speed [28]. Park, Kalev, and Hofmann propose a control algorithm of high-speed solid-rotor synchronous reluctance motor/ generator for flywheelbased uniterruptible power supplies [29].…”
Section: Rotor Estimating Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the SyRM is inherently salient, methods providing a rotorposition estimate even at standstill are readily applicable. These methods can be roughly categorized as: signal-injection methods [1], [3]- [6]; modified PWM [7], [8]; and methods based on stator current variation without additional signal [9], [10]. Since the signal-injection methods inflict additional noise and losses, back-EMF-based position estimation methods are a desirable starting point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%