“…The first opportunity is to resolve the problem [of the union's demands…] the unions demanded this… The second opportunity, which is rather hidden , is to get rid of the compounds (interview 3M3, emphasis added).As a consequence of liberalizing and outsourcing work, employers benefited from lower costs and responsibilities and increased labour market efficiencies, but mineworkers suffered increasing competition for jobs, greater precariousness in their work, worse employment conditions (including lower wages in many instances), and unexpected negative consequences of the LOA in terms of their living conditions. In the decade following implementation of the LOA, there was a massive growth of slum settlements that was clearly linked temporally and/or causally to the LOA by a range of interviewees (including managers and government and NGO representatives: e.g., interviews 1G1, 3C1, 3M1, 3M3, 3N1) and is also documented in municipal reports and scholarly studies (Bezuidenhout and Buhlungu, ). A human resources manager noted, ‘When we started issuing… the living out allowance we created the squatting camps around the mines’ (interview 3M3).…”