“…The latter perspectives, however, often developed to address distinct phenomena, are perhaps not always comparable or appropriate analogies. Matters have improved in recent years, with contributions by O'Sullivan (2008;), Ó Carragáin (20092010a;, Lash (2018a;2018b), Fredengren (2002), Newman (2007; and Soderberg (2022) advancing engaged analyses of daily life, magic, religion, landscape, art and aesthetics. Nevertheless, there remains a tendency toward empirically centred archaeologies of the first millennium AD that eschew wider theorisation or conceptual analyses; this trend had already invoked the ire of pre-Celtic Tiger reviews and syntheses (Cooney 1993, 633;.…”