Questions, questions, and more questions come to mind when meeting a client for the first time and in each session thereafter. Ellen presents an interesting profile and, in our view, because of her considerable strengths, a positive prognosis. In assessing a client, we are looking for or constructing information, depending on one's epistemological viewpoint, that makes a difference relative to therapeutic change. For us, information is either useful or not useful, as opposed to correct or incorrect. In our work with clients, interview management is an important and necessary aspect of an effective clinical approach. Thus, in some instances, depending on the client's presentation, assessment may necessarily be preceded by the pragmatic activities of establishing rapport, determining how to communicate with the client in a way that we can understand, reducing the immediacy of a crisis if necessary, and recognizing the client's motivation for therapy.In our assessment process we attempt to consider four areas: (a) the presenting problem, (b) background information about the problem itself, (c) the current family or social system organization, and (d) information about the family of origin of each spouse or partner (Lankton & Lankton, 1986, 1989Lankton, Lankton, & Matthews, 1991). Let us briefly discuss each of these four areas within the context of the specifics of Ellen's case.