Enantioselectivity in the Enzymatic Dehydration of Malate and Tartrate: Mirror Image Specificities of Structurally Similar Dehydratases

Abstract

Malate (2-hydroxysuccinic acid) and tartrate (2,3-dihydroxysuccinic acid) are chiral substrates; the former existing in two enantiomeric forms (R and S) while the latter exists as three stereoisomers (R,R; S,S; and R,S). Dehydration by stereospecific hydrogen abstraction and anti-elimination of the hydroxyl group yield the achiral products fumarate and oxaloacetate, respectively. Class-I fumarate hydratase (FH) and L-tartrate dehydratase (L-TTD) are two highly conserved enzymes belonging to the iron-sulfur cluster hydrolyase family of enzymes that catalyze reactions on specific stereoisomers of malate and tartrate. FH from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii accepts only S-malate and S,S-tartrate as substrates while the structurally similar L-TTD from Escherichia coli accepts only R-malate and R,R-tartrate as substrates. Phylogenetic analysis reveals a common evolutionary origin of L-TTDs and two-subunit archaeal FHs suggesting a divergence during evolution that may have led to the switch in substrate stereospecificity preference. Due to the high conservation of their sequences, a molecular basis for switch in stereospecificity is not evident from analysis of crystal structures of FH and predicted structure of L-TTD. The switch in enantiomer preference may be rationalised by invoking conformational plasticity of the amino acids interacting with the substrate, together with substrate reorientation and conformer selection about the C2-C3 bond of the dicarboxylic acid substrates. Although classical models of enzyme-substrate binding are insufficient to explain such a phenomenon, the enantiomer superposition model suggests that a minor reorientation in the active site residues could lead to the switch in substrate stereospecificity.