Proceedings of the 73rd International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy 2018
DOI: 10.15278/isms.2018.tc06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantiomeric Excess Measurements of Isopulegol Using Chiral Tag Spectroscopy

Abstract: Chiral analysis was performed on samples of isopulegol and its isomers using chiral tag rotational spectroscopy. Isopulegol, with three chiral centers, has 8 stereoisomers. There are four diastereomers with distinct geometries and the diastereomer ratio can be determined using traditional rotational spectroscopy. To determine the enantiomeric ratio for each diastereomer the chiral tagging method was used to convert these enantiomers into distinguishable diastereomer complexes. Isopulegol was placed into the no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviations of the experimental ee values obtained decrease as the ee values increases. A similar decreasing trend of the standard deviations has been reported by Pate and co‐workers [41,42] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The standard deviations of the experimental ee values obtained decrease as the ee values increases. A similar decreasing trend of the standard deviations has been reported by Pate and co‐workers [41,42] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Here we selected transition pairs of the most abundant homo‐/heterochiral diastereomers, i. e. homochiral I (v_c) and heterochiral I (v_d). The ee tag of PO value was taken to be 99.8 % as previously reported [41,42] . The results are demonstrated in Figure 5 in the form of histograms and the transitions and their intensities used in the analyses are summarized in Table S9, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations