2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-019-09484-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enamel Microstructure in Cetacea: a Case Study in Evolutionary Loss of Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transitional branches have mixed evolutionary histories that include a period of evolution under purifying selection followed by a period of neutral evolution after selection was relaxed and the phenotype was lost (Meredith et al, 2009). DN/dS values on transitional branches are expected to be intermediate between dN/dS values for background branches and separated into two categories to determine if there is relaxed selection on these enamel genes in odontocetes with complex enamel, i.e., enamel with prismatic radial enamel that may also exhibit Hunter-Schreger bands (HSB) or other decussations (Werth et al, 2020). DN/dS analyses with the dentin genes included three branch categories: #0 background terrestrial cetartiodactyl outgroups plus stem and crown Odontoceti, #1 stem Mysticeti + stem Balaenidae, #2 crown Balaenidae.…”
Section: Selection Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Transitional branches have mixed evolutionary histories that include a period of evolution under purifying selection followed by a period of neutral evolution after selection was relaxed and the phenotype was lost (Meredith et al, 2009). DN/dS values on transitional branches are expected to be intermediate between dN/dS values for background branches and separated into two categories to determine if there is relaxed selection on these enamel genes in odontocetes with complex enamel, i.e., enamel with prismatic radial enamel that may also exhibit Hunter-Schreger bands (HSB) or other decussations (Werth et al, 2020). DN/dS analyses with the dentin genes included three branch categories: #0 background terrestrial cetartiodactyl outgroups plus stem and crown Odontoceti, #1 stem Mysticeti + stem Balaenidae, #2 crown Balaenidae.…”
Section: Selection Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete coding sequences for all genes were recovered for all the non-cetacean cetartiodactyl outgroup taxa that were sampled, as well as for all odontocete species except for the dwarf and pygmy sperm whales (Kogia spp.) that lack well-developed enamel (Bianucci and Landini, 2006;Werth et al, 2020). Mysticetes that were sampled had varying degrees of completeness for the coding sequences of the nine tooth genes (ACP4, AMBN, AMELX, AMTN, DSPP, ENAM, KLK4, MMP20, ODAPH).…”
Section: Alignments and Gene Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Degeneracy/"devolution": The loss of complex enamel structure (typical of nearly all non-cetacean mammals) is likely linked to the loss of dental function (typical mammalian mastication) in odontocetes; this loss of complexity appears to be an example of "devolution" [94,95]. Because such losses represent potential decline of reversal of evolution, they are often referred to as degeneracy.…”
Section: Examples Of Evolutionary Terms and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolution of complexity: Just as the loss of odontocete enamel relates to loss of complex structure and function, the evolution of echolocation and vocalizing structures and behaviors in various cetaceans relates to the gain of complexity [33,36,95,110,111], as does the origin and evolution of baleen.…”
Section: Examples Of Evolutionary Terms and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%