“…The multiple-band fitting model data in table 2 reports mean carbonate values that vary by almost 100% for the same measurement data, suggesting that there may be problems with adapting these synthetic apatite models to biological apatites. Compounding this problem is the historical uncertainty about the actual carbonate concentrations in dental apatites due to individual (biological) diversity [Sakae, 2006], carbonate gradients within individual teeth [Coolidge and Jacobs, 1957;Mayer et al, 1988] and the variety of different car- Table 1. F itted peak parameters (model) and their assignments for both enamel and dentine measurements [O'Shea et al, 1974;Elliott, 1994;Miller et al, 2001;Ou-Yang et al, 2001;Akkus et al, 2004;Penel et al, 2005;Sakae, 2006] The carbonate determinations for enamel presented in this study were obtained near the DEJ, therefore it is assumed that they should be consistent with currently accepted values for sound enamel which are reported as being between 2.6 and 4.1 wt% ( table 3 ) whereas dentine has between 5.6 and 6.8 wt% [Driessens, 1982;LeGeros, 1991;Daculsi et al, 1997;Elliott, 2002;Gross and Berndt, 2002].…”