2010
DOI: 10.1177/1461445610371056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting solidarity and ambivalence: Positional identities of Arab American women

Abstract: In this research, I investigate how a group of Arab American women constructed their identities through their talk during focus group discussions. The research is based on a sociocultural view of identity as primarily social, and inclusive of the positions and roles that a person takes during moment-to-moment interaction and discourse (Bucholtz and Hall, 2005). This is compatible with a view of identity and discourse as interrelated and interdependent (Norton, 2000). I relied heavily on Bucholtz and Hall's (20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could well be that the participants used the focus groups as opportunities to develop and display solidarity that was a vital part of their identity work, again under the influence of their sense of powerlessness within the professional setting. A similar finding emerged from the study of racial minority groups (Mango, 2010). In a group where one member spoke about structural influences on professional behaviour (see data extract 3) the other participants subsequently produced stories corroborating this position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It could well be that the participants used the focus groups as opportunities to develop and display solidarity that was a vital part of their identity work, again under the influence of their sense of powerlessness within the professional setting. A similar finding emerged from the study of racial minority groups (Mango, 2010). In a group where one member spoke about structural influences on professional behaviour (see data extract 3) the other participants subsequently produced stories corroborating this position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The model has been of great benefit in studies of identity formation in real-life interaction (c.f. Del-Teso-Craviotto, 2008 andMango, 2010). The aim of this article is to extend the use of the model and apply it in a comparative study of identity construction in literary translation, where identities are twice created in the source dialogue and the target dialogue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant displays her ambivalence toward the views of other community members, as she softens the non-verbal no with a verbal yes and defends their ideological differences as a lack of awareness. This suggests that the participant disagrees with other community members' views while still understanding their perspectives and reasoning (Mango, 2010). This view allows for conciliation between divergent views, implying that efforts that raise awareness may be a lever to change attitudes and enlighten others about the harm of non-physical forms of violence.…”
Section: Theme 1: Validating Non-physical Violence To Reduce Ambivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[F] Here, the participant first addresses the prevalence of physical abuse. In the next sentence she addresses verbal abuse separately, which may reflect the participant's use of distinct (but overlapping) categories for verbal abuse and physical violence (see Mango, 2010). Such distinctions between physical and verbal abuse may reflect the relative ease of categorizing physical abuse and the relative difficulty that people face in determining when intervention is necessary in cases of verbal abuse, as a singular instance of verbal insult may not be considered violent, while ongoing and severe instances may normatively be considered abusive (Brezina, 1998).…”
Section: Theme 1: Validating Non-physical Violence To Reduce Ambivalencementioning
confidence: 99%