2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-020-09350-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting Organizational Justice and Institutional Learning in Faculty Dispute Resolution Processes: Lessons Learned from a Study of the UNC System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rogers et al (2013) looked at the knowledge, skills and training of those who have proven effective in such design work. Moreover, Gravett and Anderson (2020) in their survey of faculty who had filed grievances across a statewide university system, that for "dispute resolutions processes to function effectively, there must be greater support of persons engaged in the processes, additional training for administrators, advisors and hearing panel members, and increased transparency in reaching and reporting the outcomes of these processes" (p. 167). All four provide insights and tools designed to resolve small disputes before they escalate into costly conflicts.…”
Section: Case Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers et al (2013) looked at the knowledge, skills and training of those who have proven effective in such design work. Moreover, Gravett and Anderson (2020) in their survey of faculty who had filed grievances across a statewide university system, that for "dispute resolutions processes to function effectively, there must be greater support of persons engaged in the processes, additional training for administrators, advisors and hearing panel members, and increased transparency in reaching and reporting the outcomes of these processes" (p. 167). All four provide insights and tools designed to resolve small disputes before they escalate into costly conflicts.…”
Section: Case Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%