2019
DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v39i2.6150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting Equity in Higher Education through Critical Disability Studies: A Critical Community Self-Study

Abstract: In this critical community self-study, we describe the development of the Interdisciplinary Disability and Inclusion Research Collaborative (IDIRC) at the University of British Columbia Okanagan. IDIRC is a self-organizing collective involving eleven faculty, students and staff devoted to Critical Disability Studies (CDS) and the relationships between CDS, practice and social change. We ask: What are the social relations, commitments, activities, and research needs of this university's researchers, students an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work is centrally informed by CDS. Such a stance questions and problematizes normative assumptions and privileged discourses, particularly medical practices/discourses, that produce disability as a pathological condition residing within individuals’ bodies and minds (Goodley, 2017; Linton, 2006; Schnellert et al, 2019). In fact, CDS rejects individual and deficit-based understandings of disability, and rather affirms disability as a social/political category that serves and functions as a basis for political activism (Linton, 2006, p. 163).…”
Section: Theoretical Context: Critical Disability Studies and Disabil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work is centrally informed by CDS. Such a stance questions and problematizes normative assumptions and privileged discourses, particularly medical practices/discourses, that produce disability as a pathological condition residing within individuals’ bodies and minds (Goodley, 2017; Linton, 2006; Schnellert et al, 2019). In fact, CDS rejects individual and deficit-based understandings of disability, and rather affirms disability as a social/political category that serves and functions as a basis for political activism (Linton, 2006, p. 163).…”
Section: Theoretical Context: Critical Disability Studies and Disabil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). CDS aims to expose and interrogate “the ways in which disability has been ‘imbued with meaning(s)’ and [re-assign] meanings that are ‘consistent with a sociopolitical analysis’” (Linton, 1998, p. 10) (as cited in Schnellert et al, 2019, para. 9) and social action.…”
Section: Theoretical Context: Critical Disability Studies and Disabil...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, those with IDD are excluded (Gill, 2015: 41). Positioning IDD as a valued part of human diversity upsets normative assumptions and promotes pluralistic embodiments of sexual agency recognizing the privileges and sexual rights that ableism affords non-disabled persons (Schnellert et al, 2019). Individuals with IDD are demanding and reclaiming their rights.…”
Section: Sensitizing Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%