2004
DOI: 10.2307/20159077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting Competitive Wars: Competitive Activity, Language Games, and Market Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When referring to language games, we refer to the definition of Rindova et al . (), who argue that language games focus on how language and discourse organize experience and reality. However, given our interest in politics and power, we also refer to Foucault (1982, cited in Clegg et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When referring to language games, we refer to the definition of Rindova et al . (), who argue that language games focus on how language and discourse organize experience and reality. However, given our interest in politics and power, we also refer to Foucault (1982, cited in Clegg et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong definition of performative discourse suggests that language does not only construct reality, but also leads to and/or affects actions (e.g. Rindova et al. , 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the language game of management, of organization science, of war, and so on (e.g. Astley & Zammuto, 1992; Rindova et al. , 2004), our emphasis is procedural, akin to Wittgenstein's (1969) analysis of the language game of builders (and not of the buildings) or Grover's (1993) analysis of the language game of project management (and not of software or other products of project management).…”
Section: Research Settings and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, the rivalry between Jeff Skilling and Rebecca Mark was a by-product of the ganging dynamics. However, this aspect of "competitive wars" (Rindova, Becerra, & Contardo, 2004) and "the psychology of rivalry" (Kilduff, Elfenbein, & Staw, 2010) is gaining currency, particularly when leaders disagree about organizational identity (Voss, Cable, &Voss, 2006). This paper also has implications for the wide range of debates about organizational crisis and risk, so diverse that, in a landmark UK Royal Society report on risk, they have been referred to as the "risk archipelago" (Hood, Jones, Pidgeon, Turner, & Gibson, 1992, p. 135).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%