2022
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling Stable and Nonhysteretic Oxygen Redox Capacity in Li‐Excess Na Layered Oxides

Abstract: high-energy-density cathodes has been assigned to anion redox reaction via oxygen ions beyond the cationic redox reactions for lithium-and sodium-ion batteries (LIBs and SIBs). [1][2][3] Unfortunately, the oxygen redox reaction generally makes the oxide framework very unstable with phase transitions, resulting in various electrochemical drawbacks such as a very large voltage decay and irreversible capacity for most Li-and Na-based oxygen redox cathodes. [4][5][6] For LIBs, anomalous charge capacities delivered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mn migration into the Li layer is a critical factor in triggering electrochemical degradation after activating the OR reaction; it involves a phase transition to the spinel-type structure. Several experimental and computational methods have been explored to suppress undesired Mn migration upon charging to enable the use of OR-based Li-excess layered oxides. Although various modifications were tested, such as doping, coating, and incorporating NMC, to generate nonhysteretic charge–discharge curves in the Li-excess Mn oxide, it continued to pose a challenge. Therefore, unlike the abovementioned 3 d OR-layered Mn oxides for LIBs, several 4d and 5d Li-excess layered oxides (Li 2 RuO 3 and Li 2 IrO 3 ) were investigated to understand the fundamental mechanism of OR reactions without Ru and Ir migration into the Li layer upon charging and discharging. Unlike LIBs, a comparison based on the Li-to-Mn ratio (R) modulated two-oxide models exhibiting a P2-type structure for SIBs, Na 0.75 [Li 0.25 Mn 0.75 ]­O 2 and Na 0.6 [Li 0.2 Mn 0.8 ]­O 2 ; the latter 3 d cathode featured a nonhysteretic oxygen capacity at ∼4.2 V vs. Na + /Na without the Mn migration into the Na layer during the first cycle . The reversible OR potential was characterized by a distinct biphasic reaction in the thermodynamic perspective, and its reaction could be stabilized by the heterogeneous OR mechanism . Given the importance of superstructure control, it was revealed in Li-excess 3 d Na oxides with R = 4 that the Li ions in the [Li 0.2 Mn 0.8 ]­O 2 layer in the pristine state returned to their initial positions upon discharging after activating the first desodiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mn migration into the Li layer is a critical factor in triggering electrochemical degradation after activating the OR reaction; it involves a phase transition to the spinel-type structure. Several experimental and computational methods have been explored to suppress undesired Mn migration upon charging to enable the use of OR-based Li-excess layered oxides. Although various modifications were tested, such as doping, coating, and incorporating NMC, to generate nonhysteretic charge–discharge curves in the Li-excess Mn oxide, it continued to pose a challenge. Therefore, unlike the abovementioned 3 d OR-layered Mn oxides for LIBs, several 4d and 5d Li-excess layered oxides (Li 2 RuO 3 and Li 2 IrO 3 ) were investigated to understand the fundamental mechanism of OR reactions without Ru and Ir migration into the Li layer upon charging and discharging. Unlike LIBs, a comparison based on the Li-to-Mn ratio (R) modulated two-oxide models exhibiting a P2-type structure for SIBs, Na 0.75 [Li 0.25 Mn 0.75 ]­O 2 and Na 0.6 [Li 0.2 Mn 0.8 ]­O 2 ; the latter 3 d cathode featured a nonhysteretic oxygen capacity at ∼4.2 V vs. Na + /Na without the Mn migration into the Na layer during the first cycle . The reversible OR potential was characterized by a distinct biphasic reaction in the thermodynamic perspective, and its reaction could be stabilized by the heterogeneous OR mechanism . Given the importance of superstructure control, it was revealed in Li-excess 3 d Na oxides with R = 4 that the Li ions in the [Li 0.2 Mn 0.8 ]­O 2 layer in the pristine state returned to their initial positions upon discharging after activating the first desodiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The reversible OR potential was characterized by a distinct biphasic reaction in the thermodynamic perspective, and its reaction could be stabilized by the heterogeneous OR mechanism. 40 Given the importance of superstructure control, it was revealed in Li-excess 3d Na oxides with R = 4 that the Li ions in the [Li 0.2 Mn 0.8 ]O 2 layer in the pristine state returned to their initial positions upon discharging after activating the first desodiation.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Oxygen redox has been reported in the Na-deficient Mn-based layered oxide cathode materials for the sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and results in specific capacities up to >200 mA h g −1 . 3–5…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the O3–O1′ reversible stacking transition by layer gliding is expected to be a thermodynamic reaction mechanism, similar to the P2–O2 stacking sequence transition in Li-excess Na oxide with respect to the reversible layer gliding upon oxygen oxidation. 26,30 Fig. 1d shows that the stacking type in the Na-rich phase is a P2-type layered structure, whereas that in the Na-poor phase is an O2-type structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Along these lines, this conclusion strongly motivated a comparison of Li 1− x Mn 1/2 O 11/8 F 1/8 for LIBs versus Li-excess Na oxides for SIBs in mimicking the latter model, which showed nHR oxygen capacities upon discharge after the first charge process. 26,30…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%