2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-008-9097-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling meaningful learning through Web-based instruction with occupational therapy students

Abstract: This paper explores the design of a Web-based tutorial for Activity Analysis offered within an undergraduate course of occupational therapy and how its design features influenced meaningful learning from the students' perspective. This tutorial, using a casebased format, offers a learner-directed approach to students and the application of Activity Analysis, a clinical practice tool. The design is based on principles of meaningful learning for on-line instruction (Jonassen, Educational Technology, 35, 60-63, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instructors perceived benefits of online instruction as rich peer interactions and greater engagement with and reflection on course content (Farber, 2013;Hollis & Madill, 2006); but perceived disadvantages of significantly greater course prep time and ability of unmotivated students to disengage (Hollis & Madill, 2006). Instructors noted that careful course planning and selection of mature students have been key to success in online courses (Blackington, 2013;Doyle & Jacobs, 2013;Foster, Shurtz, & Pepper, 2014;Hollis & Madill, 2006;Mathiowetz et al, 2016;Perlman et al, 2010;Teeters Myers & O'Brien, 2015). Learners echoed that course organization was important and added that timely feedback from the instructor and active engagement with the material were critical for learning (Schaber & Shanedling, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructors perceived benefits of online instruction as rich peer interactions and greater engagement with and reflection on course content (Farber, 2013;Hollis & Madill, 2006); but perceived disadvantages of significantly greater course prep time and ability of unmotivated students to disengage (Hollis & Madill, 2006). Instructors noted that careful course planning and selection of mature students have been key to success in online courses (Blackington, 2013;Doyle & Jacobs, 2013;Foster, Shurtz, & Pepper, 2014;Hollis & Madill, 2006;Mathiowetz et al, 2016;Perlman et al, 2010;Teeters Myers & O'Brien, 2015). Learners echoed that course organization was important and added that timely feedback from the instructor and active engagement with the material were critical for learning (Schaber & Shanedling, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although online pedagogical approaches have made steady inroads within social work education, some educators caution that online courses can neither replace face-to-face experiences nor provide equivalent opportunities for socialization into the profession (Banks & Faul, 2007;Perlman, Weston, & Gisel, 2010). Critics argue that Web-based approaches offer insufficient personal interaction and collaboration, both of which are vital to the development of essential interpersonal skills valued by the profession (Allen & Seaman, 2011;Perlman et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics argue that Web-based approaches offer insufficient personal interaction and collaboration, both of which are vital to the development of essential interpersonal skills valued by the profession (Allen & Seaman, 2011;Perlman et al, 2010). Opponents also assert that online environments do not offer the same opportunity as traditional classroom settings for the dialogue, discussion, and debate necessary for authentic intellectual growth (Brabazon, 2002;York, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, case studies are often used in the education of many health professionals and are combined with a wide variety of learning activities. The cases may take the form of text cases, video cases, virtual patients, simulated or standardized patients (Cohn, Coster, & Kramer, 2014;Cook & Triola, 2009;Giles et al, 2014;Lysaght & Bent, 2005;Perlman, Weston, & Gisel, 2010;Tomlin, 2005). The formats vary in their practical applications by instructors and demands of learners.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%