Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2740908.2742914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling access to Linked Media with SPARQL-MM

Abstract: The amount of audio, video and image data on the web is immensely growing, which leads to data management problems based on the hidden character of multimedia. Therefore the interlinking of semantic concepts and media data with the aim to bridge the gap between the document web and the Web of Data has become a common practice and is known as Linked Media. However, the value of connecting media to its semantic meta data is limited due to lacking access methods specialized for media assets and fragments as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other proposed extensions of SPARQL target specific domains or types of applications, including tSPARQL [Hartig 2009], which allows for specifying and processing trust annotations in terms of which results can be trusted and why; SciS-PARQL [Andrejev and Risch 2012], which provides primitives to deal with numeric arrays of (scientific) information; SPARQL-MM [Kurz et al 2015], which proposes user-defined functions to help when querying meta-data about multimedia artefacts; GeoSPARQL [Perry and Herring 2012;Battle and Kolas 2012], stSPARQL [Koubarakis and Kyzirakos 2010] and SPARQL-ST [Perry et al 2011], which propose extensions to support spatial and temporal queries; EP-SPARQL [Anicic et al 2011], C-SPARQL [Barbieri et al 2010] and Streaming SPARQL [Bolles et al 2008], which deal with processing dynamic information and support, offering event processing, reasoning and querying over windows of streaming data, and so forth.…”
Section: A4 Further Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other proposed extensions of SPARQL target specific domains or types of applications, including tSPARQL [Hartig 2009], which allows for specifying and processing trust annotations in terms of which results can be trusted and why; SciS-PARQL [Andrejev and Risch 2012], which provides primitives to deal with numeric arrays of (scientific) information; SPARQL-MM [Kurz et al 2015], which proposes user-defined functions to help when querying meta-data about multimedia artefacts; GeoSPARQL [Perry and Herring 2012;Battle and Kolas 2012], stSPARQL [Koubarakis and Kyzirakos 2010] and SPARQL-ST [Perry et al 2011], which propose extensions to support spatial and temporal queries; EP-SPARQL [Anicic et al 2011], C-SPARQL [Barbieri et al 2010] and Streaming SPARQL [Bolles et al 2008], which deal with processing dynamic information and support, offering event processing, reasoning and querying over windows of streaming data, and so forth.…”
Section: A4 Further Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of connecting media to its semantic metadata is limited to the provided access methods specialised for media assets and fragments. Hence, the proposed model conforms with the recently issued SPARQL-MM specification [15]. SPARQL-MM extends SPARQL, the standard query language for the Semantic Web with media specific concepts and functions to unify the access to media results.…”
Section: Model Queryingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Xu et al [67] present Video Structural Description (VSD) technology for discovering semantic concepts in the video with no CEP focus. SPARQL-MM [38] defines events in terms of spatial(point, line, shape) and temporal(instant, interval) thing for linked video. Works like Object Relation Network (ORN) [16] and CogVis [22] propose a guide ontology to recognize the scene in an image while VEKG is used for modeling videos.…”
Section: Multimedia Event Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%